Re-open Sandy Hook Investigation with Independent Counsel-

Not a single witness described Lanza accurately with significant variations.

Barbara Halstead , the secretary, has 3 different stories and says  the shooter wore sunglasses. On her 911 call she said she only caught a glimpse of the shooter.

Natalie Hammond said the shooter wore a mask was 5 ft 8 inches and a medium build.  Lanza was 6 feet and a gaunt 100 pounds.

Sally Cox told a reporter that she knew the shooter and his mother. Then changed her story and said that she only saw his boots and then  hid in a closet for 4 hours until 1:15pm with Halstead ? So I guess all that sweep training by the State Police, K9, and FBI didn't pay off too much. Lanza was wearing shoes not boots as Sally asserted.

Virtually every child witness said the shooter wore green or beige pants. Interestingly they pulled a man out of the woods in cuffs by that description and we have been provided no exculpatory information.

The report asserts that the shooter died of a self inflicted wound yet the documentation indicates that he was fatally wounded by law enforcement?

Lt Vance unequivocally stated that the shooter was discovered in the hallway yet the report indicates that the shooter was found in a classroom.

A New York man was reported in cuffs because he was caught at the scene and had no explanation as to why he was there.  He was later released, we are told,after being taken to the police station and explaining he had an APP that directed him to go to the school. Does that sound at all logical?  Why didn't he explain that when he was in cuffs?

How did the shooter know the highly esoteric method of turning on the PA system? Barbara Halstead made it unequivocally clear that neither she or the nurse turned on the PA so it had to have been the shooter. Did our brilliant detective staff overlook this fact because they were too busy analyzing Lanza's 5th grade group project on Granny jokes?

This is all based on factual information in the report documentation.

Officer Cario's statement goes into extraordinary details going as far as to describe which hand another officer used when attempting to open a door. Yet Officer Cario cannot seem to recall whether he went through the doors or the broken window?

I could go on and on but I believe that I have made my point.

Sedensky may be better suited in the personal injury field and should resign from law enforcement if he does not respect the oath he had taken.

Josh January 19, 2014 at 09:38 PM
Do we have another conspiracy nut job on our hands here? There was another loony tune posting by a whacko on this topic on a different patch. Please enough with crazy conspiracy theory postings about this tragedy.
karin744 January 20, 2014 at 07:33 AM
"This is all based on factual information in the report documentation"? Really? How do we know that? Just because you "Say so" we're supposed to believe it's factual? Well, I don't believe you because you don't give us one single citation supporting your claims, just like democrats don't give us evidence that "More guns mean more crime" when the opposite is factually true: 12/28/12 http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columni… “These days, there are few things to admire about the socialist, bankrupt and culturally degenerating USA, but at least so far, one thing remains: the right to bear arms and use deadly force to defend one's self and possessions.” “For those of us fighting for our traditional rights, the US 2nd Amendment is a rare light in an ever darkening room. Governments will use the excuse of trying to protect the people from maniacs and crime, but are in reality, it is the bureaucrats protecting their power and position. In all cases where guns are banned, gun crime continues and often increases.” “Do not be fooled by a belief that progressives, leftists hate guns. Oh, no, they do not. What they hate is guns in the hands of those who are not marching in lock step of their ideology.” ------ -1/6/13 http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/20… According to Bureau of Justice Statistics, the firearm crime rate dropped from 6 victims per 1,000 residents in 1994 to 1.4 victims per 1,000 residents in 2009. This has occurred as more and more citizens have armed themselves under right-to-carry State laws. While major crimes show continuing decline in those States, this phenomenon parallels a major crime rise in heavily gun-controlled cities. ----------- -1/15/03 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/26568… BBC: "’If guns are outlawed only outlaws will have guns’" may prove prophetic. Gun crime in the UK is soaring even though it has the strictest gun control laws of any democracy.” Nine years later: 12/17/12 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-… UK’s violent crime rate per 100,000 people is 2,034; US’s is 466. -------- -2/2/11 Daily Telegraph, about piracy: “The safest ships of all [sailing in the Gulf of Aden] are flying the Russian flag: armed guards aboard them simply blow pirate boats out of the water and leave any survivors to drown. Attacks on Russian vessels have abruptly ceased.” --------- When seconds count the police are only minutes away.
Agent Leiht January 21, 2014 at 09:30 AM
When you cannot argue the facts then resort to name calling. Virtually all of my points are based on the case file documentation and not on any "theory" by me or anyone else. I did incorporate a few points based on news reports.(for example Vance's statement on where the shooter was found is based on his broadcast tv interview not the case file documentation) The levels of inconsistencies between the case documentation and the report are staggering and continue to accumulate the more that I look through the materials. A man in custody at the scene fit the precise description of the shooter provided by student witnesses. The man that was apprehended had no explanation why he was there and admitted that he had no reason to be there. This is supported in the case documentation by the official statements of Sgt Signore, Officer Heibeck, Lt Vanghele, and Detective VanNess. I consider this to be rather significant. If there is any exculpatory evidence I have not seen it yet but you would think on an issue of this magnitude that would have been provided in the report.
karin744 January 22, 2014 at 09:39 AM
Let's try this again. You say, "When you cannot argue the facts..." but you don't give us any facts, you give us "he said, she said." Nothing more than personal opinion. What distinguishes personal opinion from facts is citing where you got "A man in custody at the scene fit the precise description of the shooter provided by student witnesses." Where'd you get that information? Court testimony? Deposition? News article in the Patch? Certified statements by the "student witnesses"? Or did you just make it all up?
Agent Leiht January 22, 2014 at 03:18 PM
These are the respective statements sworn to and documented in the official state police investigation file. Police Statement Documentation References Book 6: 1. Lt. Vanghele document 00002060 2. Detective VanNess document 00001113 3. Sgt Signore document 0040428 4. Officer Heibeck document 00040345 5. Officer Penna document 00258036 6. Sgt Cario document 00026724 7. Officer Kick document 00258277 8. Child Witness document 00258277
Agent Leiht January 22, 2014 at 03:59 PM
While you are at it why don't you ask Sedensky how he goes about creating his fictional time line. Sedensky clearly reports that Officer Hofbauer, MSSGT Davis and Sgt Cario entered the school through the broken glass window. Yet Hofbauer said in his statement that an unknown Newtown Officer held the door for him. Davis said that Hofbauer held the door open for him and Cario said that he did not remember if he went through the window or the door. What is interesting about Cario is that he is the most detailed of all the police report writers and he will tell you what time he passed each tree to the tenth of a second on the drive to the school. Yet he cannot remember whether or not he went through the window. So the question is where is Sedensky getting his information and why is he trying to assert that nobody initially gained access through the door?
karin744 January 24, 2014 at 10:16 AM
Now all you need to do is combine your impressive list of citations with the claims you make. Example: "In his police report Cario stated that he cannot remember whether or not he went through the window" Sgt Cario document 00026724 7 Not trying to be a PITA here, but you're putting forth a huge claim against Sedensky. In fact, you should ponder what constitutes defamation/libel as a cause for legal action: "a published false statement that is damaging to a person's reputation; a written defamation." If I were you I'd publish a retraction of your allegations ASAP.
Aimee White February 26, 2014 at 12:14 PM
Anyone that is putting down the author of this great article has their head and ears buried into the ground for far too long. The contradictions between the first responders, investigators, hospital, parents, evidence collection list, 911 recordings, and the final report are far too many to count. The facts are clear! Not 1 EMT entered the school that day because they were given "Stand Down" Orders, and you can go your own research to try to prove me wrong! The also admit that no kid was transported by ambulance, so why would they not use an ambulance to transport the 2 children that they claimed went to the hospital but later died?? As a parent, I would demand to know who made the call to not order Air-Medivac Helicopters?? That would have been the first call for anyone working as a police officer to make! Since only a physician, or an RN with a special certification to declare death, can make the decision if someone is dead or can be resuscitated, then who assessed all 26 bodies in a matter of minutes when CT emergency responders are required by law to perform first response aid until the wounded is at the hospital and the doctor can determine viability of the injured?? All of this occurred for a fact, and if that had happened anywhere in America, all of tho first responders, city, and school would have their rear-ends in court battling lawsuits! Anyone that is a parent should be pissed off, and mad as hell that they either let those babies die and lay to die on a cold concrete floor or pissed off that they lied and used children to pull the heartstrings of Americans! There is no middle ground here! Either you demand answers to why they let those babies die, or you demand they fess up and tell the truth!
Aimee White February 26, 2014 at 12:42 PM
Karrin774, when you cannot dispute the truth, dazzle them with "Studies"! Seriously? Is that the best you have?? You are Either TOO DAMNN LAZY to go find the information that would dispute this author OR you are too DAMN STUPID and cannot see how much of this Alleged Incident makes sense! Anyone that has watched cop shows knows that you don't touch or move crime scene evidence, and you can just look at the Police Reports and their Interviews and see the amount of incompetence that day. The fact that you would chose to close your eyes, attack someone that didn't close their eyes, just makes all of your "Data" spewing look about as credible as the media's story on "Raising Adam". When you are a Big Girl, you look at the information that they released to the public and then determine if you are receiving the truth! You just don't take the media's word on something, because how many times do they get caught lying or covering up one of their owner's offshoot companies crimes? Numerous people witnessed the lack of emotions and strange behavior coming from those parents, and when they cannot even shed a SINGLE TEAR within hours of their baby supposedly being gunned down, then "Houston, We have a Problem!" That is when thousands of people woke up, and started analyzing the media accounts, the Evidence Collection, Police Interviews which are all over the internet, EMT interviews (Go look up Peter Houlahan EMT's interview because he's a doozy!), and see if any of what they said contradicts what they stated previously. These so-called professionals contradict themselves quite a lot! One of the 3 stooges that entered the school claimed that he left a girl in a pool of blood and dead people, so he could take out another 40 pound kid. Who would do that? While the officer claims to have carried a kid out, he then states that he found a car out front with all of its doors open. He then claims he found a shotgun in the backseat of the car, and then moves it to the trunk and shuts the trunk. Without even knowing how many or who the suspects were, this moron just claimed he moved evidence and stored it in the same car that the shooterS likely were driving! What idiot would not only touch the shotgun, but then store it in a place where the shooterS could reach it??? Not any police officer that I know! Then, this guy who should have every detail of that day etched in his mind, seemingly forgot that just 6 months earlier he claimed that he found the shotgun in the Passenger side of the car! Which is it?? There are too many contradictions going on with this entire event, and this is only those coming from the mouths of the people there! Unless you have took the time to Read the Evidence List, Police Reports, Final Report with Photos (which don't show anything that would prove 20 kids were shot) then you don't have any credibility with those that have! Spewing some "gun statistics" that are twisted to your beliefs is the nonsense posted on this page. Data all confirms that crime is going down because gun ownership is on the rise! Obviously, not too many people believe guns are the problem!
Aimee White February 26, 2014 at 02:38 PM
Show me where the "cries of children" are to be found on the 911 tapes, that Sedensky argued was the "Child Abuse" that allowed him to hid the tapes from the public!!! After releasing the 911 tapes, the truth came out that there were NO CHILDREN IN ANY 911 RECORDINGS! We couldn't even here gunfire in the 911 tapes. Anyone that has heard an AR-15 with .223 rounds go off inside a concrete building can attest that there is no way that the sound could not be detected on the 911 recordings! So, where is the shooting sounds on the 911 tapes?? I've listened to them, and I cannot find any evidence that a gun was being fired, much less that there was a child within the rooms that these people were calling. That was the quietest elementary school that I've ever known! Even the woman that claimed that she was shot in the foot couldn't even cry, let alone sound as though she was grimacing in pain! Please point out where I missed her wincing in pain, or fearful for her life after being shot in the foot! It's not there! The reason Sedensky fought to keep those 911 tapes sealed from the public was pretty evident after hearing an operator reveal the truth, while her co-worker was on the phone with the Janitor ("acting Janitor" as he stated on the call)! While the male 911 operator was on the phone with the "acting Janitor", his co-worker could be heard stating "there is a rumor it's fake". Then, immediately, her male co-worker told her to get off the phone. That 40 seconds of 911 tape revealed exactly what Sedensky was trying to hide! All of those 911 operators given awards for doing nothing but lying! Those awards given to EMT's that didn't do anything that day, were all for keeping quiet! Hush Awards for being good little liars, and traitors to the U.S. constitution and their fellow Americans!
Dan Plesse March 02, 2014 at 05:51 PM
"there is a rumor it's fake". http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLsSbeUmWdU


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »